当前位置: 当前位置:首页 > 知识 > 火“出圈”的ChatGPT,写完雅思作文惟独20秒! 正文

火“出圈”的ChatGPT,写完雅思作文惟独20秒!

2024-10-17 10:36:02 来源:五月披裘网 作者:百科 点击:170次
ChatGPT火了!软件推出仅两个月,完雅文活泼用户就已经突破1亿。思作

ChatGPT会写作文、独秒代码等,出圈惟独你提出详尽的完雅文成果,ChatGPT就会基于现有数据库筛选出你需要的思作谜底。而且复原速率很快,独秒多少秒钟就能患上出谜底!出圈


有网友用ChatGPT天生为了《好友记》二十年后重聚剧本,完雅文情勤俭利人造。思作

着实学生是独秒最夙开始运用这一工具的群体之一。

ChatGPT代写作业曾经成为美国大学的出圈一种征兆,审核呈现如今美国89%的完雅文大学生都是用ChatGPT做作业,学生们曾经在用ChatGPT胡作非为地做弊了,思作当初纽约的教训系统周全封杀了ChatGPT。

图片

(图片源头于网络)

这个征兆着实表明,ChatGPT在未必水平上可能处置学术钻研以及写作了。

既然软件功能很细小,那是否可能运用在雅思写作中呀。

一起来看看在软件上假如问到无关大作文的话题,会患上到甚么复原呢?


Task 2 问题

Some people think they have right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe government should control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.



ChatGPT的回覆如下:

Fresh water is a limited and precious resource that is essential for all life on earth. Some people believe that they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe that the government should control the use of fresh water to ensure its responsible use and conservation. Both views have their own merits, and it is important to understand both sides in order to make an informed decision on this issue.

 

Those who believe that they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want argue that the water is a natural resource and is therefore the property of everyone. They believe that the government should not interfere with their use of this resource, as it is their right to do so. They also argue that water should be freely available to everyone, regardless of their income or status, and that the government should not impose restrictions on its use. This view is often motivated by a belief in individual freedom and personal autonomy, and is based on the idea that each person should have the right to make their own choices about how they use fresh water.

 

On the other hand, those who believe that the government should control the use of fresh water argue that this precious resource is becoming increasingly scarce and that it is essential to ensure its responsible use and conservation. They believe that the government should set limits on the amount of water that each person can use, and should regulate the quality of the water to ensure that it is safe for human consumption. This view is often motivated by concerns about environmental sustainability and the need to protect future generations from the impacts of over-consumption of water.

 

In my opinion, both views have some valid points. It is important to recognize that fresh water is a limited and precious resource, and that it is essential to conserve it for future generations. However, it is also important to recognize that people have a right to make their own choices about how they use this resource, and that the government should not interfere with this unless it is necessary to ensure the responsible use and conservation of the water. In my view, the government should set reasonable limits on the amount of water that each person can use, while also promoting conservation and the responsible use of water. This can be achieved through education, incentives, and the implementation of effective water management policies.

 

In conclusion, the debate over the right to use fresh water as one wishes versus government control of its use is a complex and multi-faceted issue. Both sides have valid arguments, and it is important to strike a balance between individual rights and the responsible use and conservation of this precious resource. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that everyone has access to safe, clean water for present and future generations.

着实ChatGPT可能在你陷入写作瓶颈时,为你提供写作思路,可是ChatGPT提供的内容仍是需要大师认真辨此外呀,事实写作具备未必的主不雅性,其中的意见以及意见因人而异。


招待拜候启德教训留学频道 招待咨询启德教训留学顾问    

收费获取留学妄想妄想,您可能经由如下4种方式分割咱们: 

一、招待致电启德教训客户服务中间400-1010-123; 

二、招待 点击这里妨碍网络咨询; 

三、削减启德官网微信,可赶快咨询;

 

          扫一扫  赶快咨询

四、填写表单,咱们会在1-3天内为您提供业余的服务。

作者:热点
------分隔线----------------------------
头条新闻
图片新闻
新闻排行榜